<rp id="ghWs6"></rp>

      <form id="ghWs6"></form>

      <th id="ghWs6"></th>
    1. <dd id="ghWs6"><pre id="ghWs6"></pre></dd>
      <button id="ghWs6"></button>
    2. ?

      Universities in the UK are under threat. A series of reforms has made universities more like businesses, subject to market forces.

      We believe that these changes to the way universities operate and are governed pose a risk to a university’s central function, which is to gather knowledge, free from interference, and to educate people in the skills they need to think critically and independently.

      We believe that it’s time to fight back. At the heart of our campaign is a desire to resist the marketisation of higher education.?Marketisation takes many forms – below are three areas where we believe it has been especially pernicious:


      On the tenth anniversary of its formation The Council for the Defence of British Universities invites submissions of essays?on key challenges facing Higher Education in the UK today and possible solutions to them.

      Authors may take a creative, research-based or autobiographical approach, drawing on international experience where appropriate.

      Up to three prizes of £1000 each are available!


      The Council for the Defence of British Universities invites applications to undertake research into any aspect of higher education in the UK, including governance, policy, curricula developments,?and staff and student welfare and wellbeing.?

      ?Applications are?invited?from tenured academics, the precariously employed and independent researchers.

      Up to £7,500 of funding is available!?


      The TEF purports to rate university teaching, categorising each institution as gold, silver or bronze. In reality, the metrics used do not measure teaching quality – they relate instead to graduate employment rates, retention rates and scores on the National Student Survey. This misuse of proxy indicators risks damaging the reputation of UK Higher Education. The government wants TEF rankings to be linked to the ability to raise student fees. We believe that this will encourage universities to find ways of gaming the results while doing nothing to improve the quality of teaching.


      A career in university teaching is now precarious. Many universities have been saving costs by taking on recently-qualified PhD graduates and postdocs at low pay on fixed-term teaching contracts, where they may remain for years, moving from institution to institution. They provide a cheap source of labour in universities where the vice-chancellor may be earning a six-figure sum. We believe that the overuse of short-term contracts is indefensible, and does a disservice to students as well as to academics.


      The government’s Higher Education and Research Act, passed in 2017, makes it easier for new providers to offer degree courses. There is already evidence in the UK as well as the US that some private providers offer lower-quality, cut-price courses in selected subjects, leading to qualifications that have little value. Teaching at such institutions will not be backed by the strong research offering in our public universities. The UK’s universities have an excellent worldwide reputation: opening the sector to private providers without adequate safeguards risks denting that reputation as well as enabling exploitation of students.

      Read CDBU's position statement on academic freedom

      This short paper articulates the nature and importance of academic freedom as a public good and highlights the contemporary challenges it faces. In the light of recent national discussions, it also sets out suggestions for protecting academic freedom, including a model ordinance that individual institutions might adopt to assert institutional autonomy in upholding this essential principle.